Stepper Motor & Bldc Motor   Manufacturer with 15 Years!
Whatsapp:  
+86-132 1845 7319
Email: sales@leanmotor.com
Wechat: 
 +86-181 0612 7319
Home » News » NEMA 17 vs NEMA 23 vs NEMA 34 Stepper Motors: Torque, Size & Application Comparison

NEMA 17 vs NEMA 23 vs NEMA 34 Stepper Motors: Torque, Size & Application Comparison

Views: 0     Author: Site Editor     Publish Time: 2026-02-05      Origin: Site

Introduction to NEMA Stepper Motor Standards

When comparing NEMA 17, NEMA 23, and NEMA 34 stepper motors, we focus on performance-critical factors such as torque output, physical size, power requirements, and real-world application suitability. The NEMA standard defines the motor's mounting faceplate dimensions, not its electrical or torque performance. However, in practical engineering and industrial usage, NEMA size strongly correlates with torque capacity, current handling, and mechanical strength.

As stepper motor manufacturers and system integrators, we evaluate these three NEMA frame sizes from a performance-driven and application-oriented perspective, helping engineers, OEMs, and automation designers select the optimal motor for their motion control systems.


Understanding Stepper Motor Torque and Frame Size Relationship

Stepper motor torque scales with:

  • Stator size

  • Magnetic flux density

  • Rotor inertia

  • Winding design

  • Rated current and voltage

Larger NEMA sizes typically deliver higher holding torque, better resistance to load variation, and improved stability at low speeds. However, they also require more space, higher power, and stronger mechanical structures.


LeanMotor Standard Stepper Motor




NEMA 17 Stepper Motors: Compact Precision for Light Loads

NEMA 17 Technical Overview

  • Faceplate size: 42 × 42 mm

  • Typical holding torque: 30–80 N·cm

  • Rated current: 0.8–2.0 A

  • Voltage range: 2–6 V (coil rated)

  • Shaft diameter: 5 mm


Performance Characteristics

NEMA 17 stepper motors excel in precision positioning, low inertia systems, and compact mechanical designs. Their smaller rotor mass enables faster acceleration and deceleration, making them ideal for applications where speed response and positioning accuracy matter more than brute force.

With microstepping drivers, NEMA 17 motors deliver smooth motion control and reduced resonance, even in open-loop systems.


Typical Applications

  • 3D printers and desktop CNC machines

  • Medical instruments

  • Laboratory automation

  • Camera sliders and optical positioning systems

  • Small robotic arms


Advantages

  • Low power consumption

  • Compact and lightweight

  • Cost-effective for high-volume production

  • Excellent compatibility with embedded controllers


Limitations

  • Limited torque for heavy loads

  • Reduced performance at higher speeds

  • Not suitable for industrial-duty cycles



NEMA 23 Stepper Motors: Balanced Power and Versatility

NEMA 23 Technical Overview

  • Faceplate size: 57 × 57 mm

  • Typical holding torque: 120–300 N·cm

  • Rated current: 2.0–4.5 A

  • Voltage range: 3–8 V (coil rated)

  • Shaft diameter: 6.35–8 mm


Performance Characteristics

NEMA 23 stepper motors represent the most widely used industrial stepper motor size. They provide a strong balance between torque, speed, and size, making them suitable for both desktop and light industrial automation.

Compared to NEMA 17, NEMA 23 motors maintain higher torque at mid-range speeds, especially when paired with high-voltage stepper drivers.


Typical Applications

  • CNC milling machines

  • Laser cutting and engraving systems

  • Pick-and-place equipment

  • Packaging automation

  • X-Y gantry systems

Advantages

  • Strong torque-to-size ratio

  • Broad availability of drivers and accessories

  • Suitable for continuous-duty operation

  • Easy integration with gearboxes and brakes


Limitations

  • Higher power consumption than NEMA 17

  • Requires robust power supply and cooling

  • Larger footprint in compact systems



NEMA 34 Stepper Motors: Industrial Torque for Heavy-Duty Motion

NEMA 34 Technical Overview

  • Faceplate size: 86 × 86 mm

  • Typical holding torque: 400–1200 N·cm

  • Rated current: 4.0–8.0 A

  • Voltage range: 4–12 V (coil rated)

  • Shaft diameter: 12–14 mm


Performance Characteristics

NEMA 34 stepper motors are designed for high-load, high-inertia, and industrial-grade applications. Their large stator and rotor assemblies generate exceptional holding torque and strong resistance to external disturbances.

These motors perform best at low to medium speeds, where torque stability and positional rigidity are critical.


Typical Applications

  • Industrial CNC routers

  • Plasma cutting machines

  • Heavy conveyor systems

  • Textile and printing machinery

  • Large robotic positioning platforms

Advantages

  • Extremely high torque output

  • Excellent load-holding capability

  • Suitable for harsh industrial environments

  • Compatible with closed-loop stepper systems


Limitations

  • Large size and high weight

  • Higher system cost

  • Requires industrial-grade drivers and power supplies



Torque Comparison Table: NEMA 17 vs NEMA 23 vs NEMA 34

Parameter NEMA 17 NEMA 23 NEMA 34
Holding Torque 30–80 N·cm 120–300 N·cm 400–1200 N·cm
Frame Size 42 mm 57 mm 86 mm
Typical Current ≤2.0 A 2.0–4.5 A 4.0–8.0 A
Weight ~0.3 kg ~1.0 kg 3–6 kg
Application Level Light-duty Medium-duty Heavy-duty



Application-Based Selection Guide

Selecting the correct stepper motor frame size is best achieved by aligning application requirements with motor performance characteristics. Below, we outline clear, application-driven recommendations for NEMA 17, NEMA 23, and NEMA 34 stepper motors, focusing on load conditions, duty cycles, precision needs, and system scale.


Light-Duty Precision Applications – NEMA 17 Stepper Motors

Recommended for systems prioritizing compact size, precision, and low power consumption.

NEMA 17 stepper motors are ideal when space is limited and loads are relatively light. Their lower rotor inertia allows for rapid acceleration, making them well-suited for applications that require fine positioning accuracy rather than high torque.

Typical application scenarios include:

  • Desktop 3D printers

  • Small CNC engravers

  • Medical and laboratory instruments

  • Optical alignment systems

  • Consumer robotics and smart devices

Why choose NEMA 17:

  • Compact mechanical footprint

  • Excellent microstepping smoothness

  • Low heat generation

  • Cost-efficient for high-volume OEM projects

Not recommended when:

High axial loads, large gantries, or continuous industrial duty cycles are involved.


Medium-Duty Automation Systems – NEMA 23 Stepper Motors

Recommended for balanced performance between torque, speed, and system flexibility.

NEMA 23 stepper motors are the most versatile choice for general automation. They provide enough torque for mechanical transmission systems while maintaining manageable size and cost. This makes them a standard selection for industrial and semi-industrial motion platforms.

Typical application scenarios include:

  • CNC milling and routing machines

  • Laser cutting and engraving equipment

  • Pick-and-place automation

  • Linear actuators and X-Y gantry systems

  • Packaging and labeling machinery

Why choose NEMA 23:

  • Strong torque-to-size ratio

  • Broad compatibility with gearboxes and brakes

  • Stable performance at medium speeds

  • Suitable for both open-loop and closed-loop control

Not recommended when:

Very high inertia loads or extreme torque margins are required.


Heavy-Duty Industrial Equipment – NEMA 34 Stepper Motors

Recommended for high-load, high-inertia, and industrial-grade motion systems.

NEMA 34 stepper motors are designed for applications where torque stability, rigidity, and reliability are critical. Their large stator and rotor assemblies deliver exceptional holding torque, making them suitable for demanding mechanical environments.

Typical application scenarios include:

  • Industrial CNC routers

  • Plasma and waterjet cutting machines

  • Heavy conveyor and material handling systems

  • Textile, printing, and woodworking machinery

  • Large robotic positioning platforms

Why choose NEMA 34:

  • Very high torque output

  • Excellent load-holding capability

  • Long service life under continuous operation

  • Ideal for closed-loop stepper systems

Not recommended when:

Compact design, low power consumption, or lightweight construction is a priority.


Quick Selection Reference

  • Choose NEMA 17 for compact, precise, low-load motion systems

  • Choose NEMA 23 for general automation and CNC applications

  • Choose NEMA 34 for industrial, high-torque, heavy-load equipment

By matching motor frame size to real-world application demands, system designers achieve higher efficiency, improved reliability, and optimized cost-performance ratios across their motion control solutions.



Power Supply and Driver Considerations

Larger motors demand:

  • Higher current-rated stepper drivers

  • Increased DC bus voltage for speed performance

  • Adequate thermal management

  • Shielded cabling to reduce EMI

For NEMA 34 systems, we strongly recommend digital or closed-loop stepper drivers to optimize torque utilization and minimize energy loss.



Closed-Loop vs Open-Loop Compatibility

When selecting a stepper motor, understanding closed-loop and open-loop operation is critical, as it directly impacts performance, accuracy, and system reliability. The choice between these control methods depends on the motor size, load requirements, and application complexity.

Open-Loop Stepper Systems

Open-loop control is the most common method for stepper motors, where the controller sends step pulses to the motor driver without feedback on the rotor’s actual position.

Characteristics:

  • Simple and cost-effective

  • Requires no encoder or position sensor

  • Works well for low to medium torque applications

  • Limited error detection—risk of missed steps under heavy load

Best suited for:

  • NEMA 17 motors in compact 3D printers

  • Small CNC machines with low inertia loads

  • Light-duty automation where torque margins are adequate

Advantages:

  • Lower system cost

  • Simplified wiring and control logic

  • Sufficient for most precision tasks under controlled load


Limitations:

  • Can lose steps under sudden load changes

  • Reduced performance in high-torque, high-inertia applications

  • No automatic correction for positional errors


Closed-Loop Stepper Systems

Closed-loop control integrates a feedback sensor (typically an encoder) to monitor the rotor position in real-time. The controller adjusts current and step pulses to maintain accurate positioning, effectively combining the simplicity of stepper motors with the reliability of servo systems.

Characteristics:

  • Real-time monitoring and correction of motor position

  • Improved torque performance and dynamic response

  • Reduced heat and energy consumption by optimizing current

  • Capable of handling heavier loads and high-inertia systems

Best suited for:

  • NEMA 23 motors in mid-sized CNC and automation systems

  • NEMA 34 motors in industrial, high-torque machinery

  • Applications requiring precise position verification and fault detection

Advantages:

  • Eliminates missed steps and reduces mechanical stress

  • Higher efficiency through adaptive current control

  • Supports complex motion profiles and high-speed operation

  • Ideal for systems with variable loads or external disturbances

Limitations:

  • Higher system cost due to encoders and advanced drivers

  • Slightly more complex wiring and setup

  • Requires compatible closed-loop drivers for full benefit


Motor Size and Control Method Recommendation

NEMA Size Typical Control Reasoning
NEMA 17 Open-loop Low torque and light loads make feedback unnecessary
NEMA 23 Open-loop or Closed-loop Moderate loads may benefit from closed-loop for precision
NEMA 34 Closed-loop High torque and industrial loads require real-time position correction

Choosing the appropriate control method ensures that the stepper motor operates at peak efficiency, maintains positional accuracy, and prevents mechanical failures under dynamic load conditions. Closed-loop systems are increasingly preferred for industrial and heavy-duty automation, while open-loop remains sufficient for light-duty and compact designs.



Final Comparison Summary

  • NEMA 17 delivers compact precision for light loads

  • NEMA 23 offers the best balance of torque and flexibility

  • NEMA 34 provides industrial-grade performance for demanding applications

Selecting the correct NEMA size ensures optimal performance, system stability, and long-term reliability.


If you have any questions, please contact us via email or telephone and we will get back to you as soon as possible.

Contact Us

Copyright© 2023 Changzhou LeanMotor Transmission Co.Ltd.All Rights Reserved.| Sitemap |Privacy Policy |Support By Leadong.